"They've been ripping us off for years-Europe, Korea, all of them. As President, I'm fixing it. America will be respected again." AMERICA FIRST DOCTRINE by the POTUS TRUMP (the greatest leader in the U.S. history)

"WE , THE PROUD AMERICAN  PEOPLE -U.S Citizens Only ! (No Dual Loyalty1)"

Judicial Subversion, Geostrategic Destabilization, and the Legal and Diplomatic Implications of Moon Hyungbae and the Woori Law Society

I. South Korea’s Judicial Crisis as a Strategic Liability: A Watchdog Assessment of U.S. National Security Implications

The attempted impeachment of President Yoon Suk-yeol is not a routine legal proceeding—it is a covertly orchestrated assault on democratic governance, designed to cripple South Korea’s constitutional order and realign the nation within the geopolitical orbit of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). This is not conjecture. It is an assertion grounded in extensive intelligence assessments, clear patterns of subversive political operations, and the observable collusion of judicial actors beholden to foreign interests.

The 29 impeachment motions, targeting not only the President but also the Minister of Justice, the Prime Minister, the Board of Audit and Inspection, and key prosecutors, represent an unprecedented attempt to dismantle the South Korean government. These motions were filed without passing through the National Assembly’s Legislation and Judiciary Committee, a blatant circumvention of constitutional due process.

This pattern of judicial weaponization is a classic maneuver deployed by regimes seeking to achieve regime change under the veneer of legality. In this case, however, the implications extend far beyond South Korea’s borders. The United States, as the primary security guarantor of the Indo-Pacific, is already recalibrating its strategic assessments to account for the erosion of institutional integrity in Seoul.

A. South Korea’s Classification as a “Sensitive Country”

In response to the unfolding crisis, the U.S. Department of Energy has formally reclassified South Korea as a “sensitive country,” placing it under heightened scrutiny in matters of energy security, technology transfers, and defense cooperation. This classification signals that Washington views South Korea’s institutional stability as compromised, requiring preemptive measures to mitigate potential strategic vulnerabilities.

This is not merely an administrative decision; it is a harbinger of broader U.S. policy shifts that will impose substantial restrictions on South Korea’s access to critical technologies, military collaborations, and financial markets if judicial corruption continues unabated.

B. U.S. Strategic Reassessment of South Korea’s Visa Waiver Program (VWP)

Given South Korea’s deteriorating institutional integrity, the United States must also undertake a comprehensive reassessment of South Korea’s continued eligibility for the Visa Waiver Program (VWP).

The VWP is not an immutable entitlement; it is a conditional privilege granted to nations that uphold democratic governance, the rule of law, and a stable security framework aligned with U.S. strategic interests. However, in light of the South Korean judiciary’s alignment with anti-democratic forces, its facilitation of judicial warfare, and its systemic erosion of constitutional norms, the continued inclusion of South Korea in the VWP is no longer a foregone conclusion.

Policy Rationale and Strategic Consequences

A revocation of South Korea’s VWP designation would not be merely punitive—it would serve as a calibrated policy response to deter further democratic backsliding while signaling Washington’s commitment to upholding international norms. The strategic and diplomatic consequences of such a measure would include:

• The Implementation of Heightened Visa Requirements

• South Korean nationals would no longer enjoy automatic entry privileges into the United States, reversing decades of preferential treatment.

• Instead, all travelers would be required to undergo rigorous U.S. visa screening procedures, ensuring that individuals with affiliations to subversive organizations or foreign intelligence entities do not exploit visa-free travel for illicit purposes.

• A Formal Recalibration of U.S.-South Korea Bilateral Relations

• The downgrade of South Korea’s VWP status would reflect a shift in U.S. strategic posture, reinforcing the assessment that South Korea is transitioning from a stable democratic partner to a nation compromised by judicial corruption and CCP-aligned subversion.

• This would serve as a direct diplomatic signal to Seoul’s ruling elites—particularly those complicit in the erosion of democratic norms—that continued judicial interference in governance will bear tangible consequences.

• Restrictions on Business, Academic, and Scientific Exchanges

• South Korea’s economic connectivity with the United States would face new structural limitations, as stricter visa protocols would complicate corporate engagements, research collaborations, and academic partnerships.

• U.S. national security officials would closely scrutinize visa applications from South Korean nationals involved in sensitive technology sectors, mitigating risks associated with intellectual property theft and espionage activities.

II. The Woori Law Society: A Communist Revolutionary Organization Operating as a CCP Proxy in South Korea’s Judiciary

A. The Woori Law Society’s Role as an Instrument of Judicial Warfare

At the epicenter of this judicial subversion stands the Woori Law Society (우리법 연구회)—a clandestine faction within South Korea’s judiciary that operates as a legal insurgency committed to the systematic dismantling of constitutional democracy.

Contrary to its nominal designation as a legal research society, Woori Law functions as a CCP-aligned judicial vanguard, employing legal mechanisms to facilitate the leftist political takeover of South Korea. Its operational objectives align not with democratic jurisprudence but with Marxist-Leninist strategies of subversion and ideological infiltration.

This is not a theoretical assertion but an empirically verifiable reality. Woori Law:

• Exerts disproportionate influence over judicial appointments, ensuring that its ideological operatives control critical legal decisions.

• Has systematically ruled in favor of leftist political actors while obstructing conservative governance through procedural delays and judicial activism.

• Maintains opaque ties with South Korean political factions that have demonstrable financial and strategic linkages to Beijing.

B. The Woori Law Society’s Violation of South Korean National Security Law

The existence and operations of the Woori Law Society constitute a direct violation of South Korea’s National Security Act (국가보안법), which explicitly prohibits organizations that advocate communist revolution or align with foreign totalitarian regimes.

By all objective measures, Woori Law meets the definitional criteria of an illegal communist front organization. Yet, it continues to operate unchecked, leveraging its judicial positioning to shield itself from scrutiny.

If South Korea’s judiciary remains captured by Woori Law’s subversive agenda, the United States will be forced to reevaluate its strategic posture towards South Korea as a whole.

III. The Geostrategic Ramifications: Why the United States Cannot Tolerate a CCP-Subjugated South Korea

A. The Destabilization of the U.S.-ROK Security Alliance

• South Korea is a linchpin in the U.S. Indo-Pacific security architecture. If its judiciary enables a leftist coup, the repercussions will extend beyond Seoul to the broader regional balance.

• Judicial obstructionism could impede U.S. military basing rights, joint operations, and intelligence-sharing mechanisms.

IV. The Global Magnitsky Reckoning: The Inevitable Sanctions Against Moon Hyungbae and His Accomplices

Under the Global Magnitsky Act, the United States retains the authority to sanction foreign officials engaged in judicial corruption, democratic subversion, and human rights abuses.

If Moon Hyungbae continues to delay the dismissal of these unconstitutional impeachment motions, he will face:

• The freezing of all U.S.-linked financial assets, including real estate, investment portfolios, and bank accounts.

• A global banking ban, enforced through SWIFT, effectively cutting him off from international financial systems.

• A permanent travel ban, barring him and his family from entry into the United States and allied nations.

V. A Final Declaration: The United States Will Not Accommodate Judicial Treachery

Moon Hyungbae, you are not merely adjudicating a constitutional dispute—you are presiding over a geopolitical inflection point that will determine whether South Korea remains a sovereign democracy or degenerates into a CCP client state.

The United States has already begun implementing countermeasures. If South Korea’s judiciary fails to restore constitutional order, Washington will escalate its responses accordingly.

The United States is no longer merely watching. It is preparing to act.

The Stop CCP VISAs Act of 2025

119TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. __

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit the admission of Chinese nationals as nonimmigrant students, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Mr. MOORE of West Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on ________________

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit the admission of Chinese nationals as nonimmigrant students, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Stop Chinese Communist Prying by Vindicating Intellectual Safeguards in Academia Act of 2025” or the “Stop CCP VISAs Act of 2025.”

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ADMISSION OF CHINESE NATIONALS AS NONIMMIGRANT STUDENTS.

Section 214 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(s) PROHIBITION ON ADMISSION OF CHINESE NATIONALS AS NONIMMIGRANT STUDENTS.—

An alien who is a national of the People’s Republic of China may not be issued a visa or otherwise provided status as a nonimmigrant under section 101(a)(15)(F), (J), or (M), for the purpose of conducting research or pursuing a course of study.”

https://www.ntd.com/house-republicans-introduce-legislation-to-ban-chinese-nationals-from-obtaining-us-student-visas_1054184.html

"WE , THE PROUD AMERICAN  PEOPLE -U.S Citizens Only ! (No Dual Loyalty1)"

Judicial Subversion, Geostrategic Destabilization, and the Legal and Diplomatic Implications of Moon Hyungbae and the Woori Law Society

I. South Korea’s Judicial Crisis as a Strategic Liability: A Watchdog Assessment of U.S. National Security Implications

The attempted impeachment of President Yoon Suk-yeol is not a routine legal proceeding—it is a covertly orchestrated assault on democratic governance, designed to cripple South Korea’s constitutional order and realign the nation within the geopolitical orbit of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). This is not conjecture. It is an assertion grounded in extensive intelligence assessments, clear patterns of subversive political operations, and the observable collusion of judicial actors beholden to foreign interests.

The 29 impeachment motions, targeting not only the President but also the Minister of Justice, the Prime Minister, the Board of Audit and Inspection, and key prosecutors, represent an unprecedented attempt to dismantle the South Korean government. These motions were filed without passing through the National Assembly’s Legislation and Judiciary Committee, a blatant circumvention of constitutional due process.

This pattern of judicial weaponization is a classic maneuver deployed by regimes seeking to achieve regime change under the veneer of legality. In this case, however, the implications extend far beyond South Korea’s borders. The United States, as the primary security guarantor of the Indo-Pacific, is already recalibrating its strategic assessments to account for the erosion of institutional integrity in Seoul.

A. South Korea’s Classification as a “Sensitive Country”

In response to the unfolding crisis, the U.S. Department of Energy has formally reclassified South Korea as a “sensitive country,” placing it under heightened scrutiny in matters of energy security, technology transfers, and defense cooperation. This classification signals that Washington views South Korea’s institutional stability as compromised, requiring preemptive measures to mitigate potential strategic vulnerabilities.

This is not merely an administrative decision; it is a harbinger of broader U.S. policy shifts that will impose substantial restrictions on South Korea’s access to critical technologies, military collaborations, and financial markets if judicial corruption continues unabated.

B. U.S. Strategic Reassessment of South Korea’s Visa Waiver Program (VWP)

Given South Korea’s deteriorating institutional integrity, the United States must also undertake a comprehensive reassessment of South Korea’s continued eligibility for the Visa Waiver Program (VWP).

The VWP is not an immutable entitlement; it is a conditional privilege granted to nations that uphold democratic governance, the rule of law, and a stable security framework aligned with U.S. strategic interests. However, in light of the South Korean judiciary’s alignment with anti-democratic forces, its facilitation of judicial warfare, and its systemic erosion of constitutional norms, the continued inclusion of South Korea in the VWP is no longer a foregone conclusion.

Policy Rationale and Strategic Consequences

A revocation of South Korea’s VWP designation would not be merely punitive—it would serve as a calibrated policy response to deter further democratic backsliding while signaling Washington’s commitment to upholding international norms. The strategic and diplomatic consequences of such a measure would include:

• The Implementation of Heightened Visa Requirements

• South Korean nationals would no longer enjoy automatic entry privileges into the United States, reversing decades of preferential treatment.

• Instead, all travelers would be required to undergo rigorous U.S. visa screening procedures, ensuring that individuals with affiliations to subversive organizations or foreign intelligence entities do not exploit visa-free travel for illicit purposes.

• A Formal Recalibration of U.S.-South Korea Bilateral Relations

• The downgrade of South Korea’s VWP status would reflect a shift in U.S. strategic posture, reinforcing the assessment that South Korea is transitioning from a stable democratic partner to a nation compromised by judicial corruption and CCP-aligned subversion.

• This would serve as a direct diplomatic signal to Seoul’s ruling elites—particularly those complicit in the erosion of democratic norms—that continued judicial interference in governance will bear tangible consequences.

• Restrictions on Business, Academic, and Scientific Exchanges

• South Korea’s economic connectivity with the United States would face new structural limitations, as stricter visa protocols would complicate corporate engagements, research collaborations, and academic partnerships.

• U.S. national security officials would closely scrutinize visa applications from South Korean nationals involved in sensitive technology sectors, mitigating risks associated with intellectual property theft and espionage activities.

II. The Woori Law Society: A Communist Revolutionary Organization Operating as a CCP Proxy in South Korea’s Judiciary

A. The Woori Law Society’s Role as an Instrument of Judicial Warfare

At the epicenter of this judicial subversion stands the Woori Law Society (우리법 연구회)—a clandestine faction within South Korea’s judiciary that operates as a legal insurgency committed to the systematic dismantling of constitutional democracy.

Contrary to its nominal designation as a legal research society, Woori Law functions as a CCP-aligned judicial vanguard, employing legal mechanisms to facilitate the leftist political takeover of South Korea. Its operational objectives align not with democratic jurisprudence but with Marxist-Leninist strategies of subversion and ideological infiltration.

This is not a theoretical assertion but an empirically verifiable reality. Woori Law:

• Exerts disproportionate influence over judicial appointments, ensuring that its ideological operatives control critical legal decisions.

• Has systematically ruled in favor of leftist political actors while obstructing conservative governance through procedural delays and judicial activism.

• Maintains opaque ties with South Korean political factions that have demonstrable financial and strategic linkages to Beijing.

B. The Woori Law Society’s Violation of South Korean National Security Law

The existence and operations of the Woori Law Society constitute a direct violation of South Korea’s National Security Act (국가보안법), which explicitly prohibits organizations that advocate communist revolution or align with foreign totalitarian regimes.

By all objective measures, Woori Law meets the definitional criteria of an illegal communist front organization. Yet, it continues to operate unchecked, leveraging its judicial positioning to shield itself from scrutiny.

If South Korea’s judiciary remains captured by Woori Law’s subversive agenda, the United States will be forced to reevaluate its strategic posture towards South Korea as a whole.

III. The Geostrategic Ramifications: Why the United States Cannot Tolerate a CCP-Subjugated South Korea

A. The Destabilization of the U.S.-ROK Security Alliance

• South Korea is a linchpin in the U.S. Indo-Pacific security architecture. If its judiciary enables a leftist coup, the repercussions will extend beyond Seoul to the broader regional balance.

• Judicial obstructionism could impede U.S. military basing rights, joint operations, and intelligence-sharing mechanisms.

IV. The Global Magnitsky Reckoning: The Inevitable Sanctions Against Moon Hyungbae and His Accomplices

Under the Global Magnitsky Act, the United States retains the authority to sanction foreign officials engaged in judicial corruption, democratic subversion, and human rights abuses.

If Moon Hyungbae continues to delay the dismissal of these unconstitutional impeachment motions, he will face:

• The freezing of all U.S.-linked financial assets, including real estate, investment portfolios, and bank accounts.

• A global banking ban, enforced through SWIFT, effectively cutting him off from international financial systems.

• A permanent travel ban, barring him and his family from entry into the United States and allied nations.

V. A Final Declaration: The United States Will Not Accommodate Judicial Treachery

Moon Hyungbae, you are not merely adjudicating a constitutional dispute—you are presiding over a geopolitical inflection point that will determine whether South Korea remains a sovereign democracy or degenerates into a CCP client state.

The United States has already begun implementing countermeasures. If South Korea’s judiciary fails to restore constitutional order, Washington will escalate its responses accordingly.

The United States is no longer merely watching. It is preparing to act.

The Stop CCP VISAs Act of 2025

119TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. __

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit the admission of Chinese nationals as nonimmigrant students, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Mr. MOORE of West Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on ________________

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit the admission of Chinese nationals as nonimmigrant students, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Stop Chinese Communist Prying by Vindicating Intellectual Safeguards in Academia Act of 2025” or the “Stop CCP VISAs Act of 2025.”

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ADMISSION OF CHINESE NATIONALS AS NONIMMIGRANT STUDENTS.

Section 214 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(s) PROHIBITION ON ADMISSION OF CHINESE NATIONALS AS NONIMMIGRANT STUDENTS.—

An alien who is a national of the People’s Republic of China may not be issued a visa or otherwise provided status as a nonimmigrant under section 101(a)(15)(F), (J), or (M), for the purpose of conducting research or pursuing a course of study.”

https://www.ntd.com/house-republicans-introduce-legislation-to-ban-chinese-nationals-from-obtaining-us-student-visas_1054184.html

Unrestricted Warfare(CCP) : 초한전

SAVE AMERICA, SAVE JAPAN, SAVE KOREA and SAVE ISRAEL

. 

Urgent Condemnation: South Korea’s National Security at Risk Due to CCP Infiltration and Opposition-Led Subversion – The U.S. Must Consider Adding South Korea to the Sensitive Country List

The United States must urgently consider designating South Korea as a “Sensitive Country” due to the grave national security threats posed by the infiltration of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) operatives and the subversive actions of Lee Jae-myung’s party. Under Lee’s leadership, the opposition has engaged in systematic regime subversion, attempting to overthrow the government, illegally detain the sitting president, and create a power vacuum by orchestrating 29 reckless impeachments, targeting the President, Prime Minister, prosecutors, the Minister of Justice, the Auditor General, and top military commanders.

This reckless impeachment campaign was led by Chung Cheong-rae, a known anti-American figure with a history of terrorist activities against the United States, including a bomb attack on the U.S. Embassy. Lee Jae-myung, a staunch anti-American politician and a puppet of the CCP, empowered Chung Cheong-rae to lead this coordinated effort to dismantle South Korea’s democratic system, leaving the nation defenseless against CCP influence. Their ultimate goal is to transform South Korea into a satellite state of China, undermining the U.S.-ROK alliance and jeopardizing regional stability.

At the same time, Lee’s party has actively blocked necessary legislation to punish Chinese spies, allowing CCP operatives to illegally surveil U.S. nuclear aircraft carriers on the Korean Peninsula without consequence. These actions not only compromise South Korea’s sovereignty but also endanger U.S. military and strategic interests in the region.

Given the severity of the situation, the U.S. Department of Energy must act swiftly to list South Korea as a Sensitive Country to prevent further CCP infiltration, safeguard U.S. national security interests, and counter the growing anti-American subversion orchestrated by Lee Jae-myung and his allies.

 Note: There is no Korean expert with integrity who truthfully speaks about what is happening in South Korea. Every so-called expert is compromised by Chinese and Korean money and lacks independent credibility. Furthermore, these experts do not understand the true structure of South Korea’s elite society, including the SKY league (Seoul National University, Korea University, Yonsei University) and the exclusive elite culture in Seoul, which plays a critical role in shaping the country’s power dynamics. 

WIS

The True Hero.

It was a recognition of his profound contributions to legal governance, constitutional preservation, and national sovereignty. His leadership in judicial appointments, religious freedom, criminal justice reform, border security, and economic law left an enduring legal legacy that will influence American jurisprudence for decades.

1. Championing Religious Liberty & Constitutional Rights

President Trump emerged as a fierce defender of religious freedom, ensuring that faith-based organizations and individuals retained their constitutional rights without government interference. Under his administration:

• He issued executive orders protecting religious speech, ensuring that churches, Christian schools, and ministries could operate without fear of legal retaliation.

• Faith-based organizations were granted equal access to federal funding, overturning policies that had marginalized religious institutions.

• His administration reinstated and expanded the Mexico City Policy, preventing U.S. taxpayer funds from being used to support abortion providers abroad

2. Strengthening the Judiciary & Restoring the Rule of Law

President Trump’s judicial legacy secured constitutional originalism for generations by appointing more than 300 federal judges, including three U.S. Supreme Court Justices:

• Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett were selected based on their commitment to textualist and originalist interpretations of the U.S. Constitution.

• His appointments to the federal bench ensured that judicial activism was curbed, reinforcing the founding principles of separation of powers and strict constitutional interpretation.

• These historic appointments reshaped the American legal system, protecting First and Second Amendment rights and reinforcing the judicial safeguards of religious freedom.

3. Pioneering Criminal Justice Reform: The First Step Act

One of Trump’s most bipartisan accomplishments, the First Step Act, reflected his commitment to justice and rehabilitation:

• The law reduced mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent offenses and implemented rehabilitation programs to lower recidivism rates.

• It provided second chances for reformed individuals, aligning with biblical values of redemption, restoration, and fairness.

• Despite being a Republican president, Trump garnered bipartisan support, proving his ability to unite political factions for meaningful legal change.

4. Economic Leadership & Lawful Governance

Trump’s economic policies were not merely financial strategies—they were deeply tied to constitutional principles of limited government, property rights, and free enterprise:

• Lowering corporate taxes and cutting excessive regulations allowed businesses to flourish, embodying the founding principles of individual economic freedom.

• Deregulation efforts protected businesses from legal uncertainty, reinforcing a pro-business legal framework that promoted national prosperity.

• His administration’s approach to economic governance ensured legal clarity, reduced bureaucratic overreach, and upheld the American ideals of a free-market system.

5. Defending National Security & Enforcing Immigration Laws

Trump took a strict constitutional approach to border security, ensuring that the sovereign right of the United States to enforce its own laws was protected:

• He implemented the Remain in Mexico Policy, requiring asylum seekers to follow legal pathways instead of exploiting loopholes.

• Ended catch-and-release, ensuring that individuals entering the country illegally could not simply be released into American communities without proper legal proceedings.

• Strengthened vetting procedures for immigrants from countries with high national security risks, prioritizing lawful entry over unlawful migration.

• His commitment to border security was rooted in the rule of law, ensuring that legal immigration was preserved while addressing illegal immigration in a constitutionally sound manner.

6. Advancing Foreign Policy Based on Legal Principles

Trump’s foreign policy doctrine—America First—prioritized national sovereignty, adherence to international law, and constitutional diplomacy:

• Moved the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem, fulfilling the long-ignored 1995 Jerusalem Embassy Act, demonstrating that America abides by its own laws and commitments.

• Negotiated historic peace agreements in the Middle East, such as the Abraham Accords, showcasing a legal and diplomatic approach to conflict resolution.

• Enforced trade deals that upheld fair legal practices, preventing foreign powers from exploiting loopholes in U.S. trade laws.

7. Executive Leadership & Defining Legal Precedents

Trump’s presidency was marked by bold legal maneuvers that reinforced executive authority, reduced bureaucratic overreach, and reaffirmed constitutional governance:

• He navigated complex legal battles, from impeachment trials to Supreme Court challenges, all while maintaining a strict commitment to constitutional interpretation.

• Rolled back federal overreach, ensuring that power was returned to the states, reinforcing the Tenth Amendment principle of state sovereignty.

• His executive actions reshaped legal precedents, ensuring that future administrations followed a clear and law-abiding approach to governance.

This situation is similar to a baseball play where the pitcher (China) catches the ball hit by the batter and pretends to throw it to first base (which here represents Taiwan) but instead throws it to second base (South Korea to get the runner out. The Chinese Communist Party is feigning interest in Taiwan and escalating tensions with the U.S., while in reality, it is orchestrating the manipulation of South Korea's electoral system to consolidate its influence.

CCP OUT & HUAWEI OUT

 It would be fair in terms of cross-cultural perspective to treat South Korea's SKY universities (like  Korea University, Yonsei University and Seoul Nat'l U) on par with American institutions such as Harvard, Yale, and Princeton.

Royal Edict "KoYon": A Missive of Utmost Discretion and Unassailable Safeguarding

To the Illustrious Assemblage of the Worldwide Scholastic Community and the Loyal Denizens of the Sovereignty,

An Encrypted Manifesto of Scholarly Superiority and Universal Acclamation

With the most stringent discretion and an unwavering pledge to impenetrable safeguarding, we hereby address you in the name of a preeminent consortium. This momentous disclosure pertains to an extraordinary triumph in the sphere of global tertiary education.

It is with immense pride and an ingrained sense of obligation that we unveil the tidings concerning the noble coalition, known collectively as "KoYon" - an amalgamation of Korea University and Yonsei University. These bastions of learning, acclaimed for their steadfast devotion to scholastic supremacy, have attained a stature parallel to the esteemed "Oxbridge" of Europe and the renowned Harvard-Yale duo in the New World.

The accolade conferred upon KoYon in the most recent issuance of the Guardian University Rankings is a feat of unparalleled distinction. It is a resounding affirmation of their relentless pursuit of academic preeminence, the advancement of pioneering inquiries, and the cultivation of the most luminary intellects.

Matching the eminence of Oxbridge and Harvard-Yale, KoYon emerges as the zenith of educational excellence in Asia, casting a brilliant light upon the scholarly and cultural milieu. Their induction into the venerated Guardian rankings is a source of boundless exultation, further cementing their status as bastions of innovation and thought leadership on a global scale.

As we bear witness to this epochal juncture, let us acknowledge and exult in the ascension of these academic institutions beyond the confines of geography. Collectively, they contribute to the enrichment and proliferation of worldwide erudition and comprehension.

In recognition of this towering accomplishment, and in homage to the perpetual quest for knowledge, it is our esteemed privilege to proclaim that these institutions exemplify the quintessence of academic distinction and international preeminence. May their legacy of unrivaled excellence continue to kindle the aspirations of future generations.

Let this communique be received with the highest level of discretion and safeguarding, ensuring the enduring significance of this milestone for all posterity.

Long may the quest for enlightenment and the guardianship of scholarly superiority flourish!

Royal Edict "KoYon": 

A Missive of Utmost Discretion and Unassailable Safeguarding

To the Illustrious Assemblage of the Worldwide Scholastic Community and the Loyal Denizens of the Sovereignty,

An Encrypted Manifesto of Scholarly Superiority and Universal Acclamation

With the most stringent discretion and an unwavering pledge to impenetrable safeguarding, we hereby address you in the name of a preeminent consortium. This momentous disclosure pertains to an extraordinary triumph in the sphere of global tertiary education.

It is with immense pride and an ingrained sense of obligation that we unveil the tidings concerning the noble coalition, known collectively as "KoYon" - an amalgamation of Korea University and Yonsei University. These bastions of learning, acclaimed for their steadfast devotion to scholastic supremacy, have attained a stature parallel to the esteemed "Oxbridge" of Europe and the renowned Harvard-Yale duo in the New World.

The accolade conferred upon KoYon in the most recent issuance of the Guardian University Rankings is a feat of unparalleled distinction. It is a resounding affirmation of their relentless pursuit of academic preeminence, the advancement of pioneering inquiries, and the cultivation of the most luminary intellects.

Matching the eminence of Oxbridge and Harvard-Yale, KoYon emerges as the zenith of educational excellence in Asia, casting a brilliant light upon the scholarly and cultural milieu. Their induction into the venerated Guardian rankings is a source of boundless exultation, further cementing their status as bastions of innovation and thought leadership on a global scale.

As we bear witness to this epochal juncture, let us acknowledge and exult in the ascension of these academic institutions beyond the confines of geography. Collectively, they contribute to the enrichment and proliferation of worldwide erudition and comprehension.

In recognition of this towering accomplishment, and in homage to the perpetual quest for knowledge, it is our esteemed privilege to proclaim that these institutions exemplify the quintessence of academic distinction and international preeminence. May their legacy of unrivaled excellence continue to kindle the aspirations of future generations.

Let this communique be received with the highest level of discretion and safeguarding, ensuring the enduring significance of this milestone for all posterity.

Long may the quest for enlightenment and the guardianship of scholarly superiority flourish!

ASU partners with the Saudi Arabian Ministry of Education : https://news.asu.edu/20180912-asu-partners-saudi-arabian-ministry-education-welcomes-cohort-saudi-educators

ASU in Saudi Arabia(NEOM) :  Saudi Arabia with ASU https://saudiarabia.asu.edu

https://youtu.be/bxOLNIOPyHo?si=9u-y2KuyrEDGmG4O

https://saudiarabia.asu.edu/alumni